This page is intentionally left blank: Difference between revisions

This page is intentionally left blank (view source)

Revision as of 22:59, 31 December 2016

No change in size , 31 December 2016

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

82,891

edits

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 Beyond dispensing with the concern that there might be writing on it that you just can’t see, what could this mean?
-Does it distinguish a ''wantonly'' blank page from one whose lack of content came about from a feebler conviction? (Recklessness<ref>in that the author apprehended the risk the page would be bare and took it anyway.</ref>, for example, or negligence<ref>In that a reasonable person in the author’s position would have realised there was a risk the page would be blank</ref> in omitting to put anything on a page? Could the redundant page have been overlooked through no cognitive operation, actual or constructive, on the author’s part at all?
+Does it distinguish a ''wantonly'' blank page from one whose lack of content came about from a feebler conviction (recklessness<ref>in that the author apprehended the risk the page would be bare and took it anyway.</ref>, for example, or negligence<ref>In that a reasonable person in the author’s position would have realised there was a risk the page would be blank</ref> in omitting to put anything on a page)? Could the redundant page have been overlooked through no cognitive operation, actual or constructive, on the author’s part at all?
 Agonising over the writer’s [[mens rea]] obscures the real question: WHO CARES? What difference does it make why the page is blank? It ''is'' blank: that is a brute existential fact<ref>Or would be, had you not written that very thing on the page to contradict yourself. See below.</ref>.