To the fullest extent permissible by law: Difference between revisions

Now, should it transpire that, for all the Issuer’s bluntest warnings the fullest extent of the law did not allow it off a hook to which the law’s gentler passages might have turned a blind eye — and we quite like the idea there are lazy stretches further down the legal river that aren’t as wet ’n’ wild as its far reaches —  then in that case, for investors, happy days; they’re in the money, however terse and to the point the Issuer has been in its disclaimer.  But what would the Issuer have gained by tempering its disclaimer with this “fullest extent” vacillation in any case?