Trade exposures with CCPs - CRR Provision: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:


Looking at it another way, if such a [[carve-out]] did invalidate {{crrprov|306(1)(c)}} then the provision would have no application at all, because it would be commercially impossible to remove it.
Looking at it another way, if such a [[carve-out]] did invalidate {{crrprov|306(1)(c)}} then the provision would have no application at all, because it would be commercially impossible to remove it.
 
{{seealso}}
*The [[Basel]] / [[BIS]] paper on which this turbulent regulation was based: [[Capital requirements for bank exposures to central counterparties]]
{{ref}}
{{ref}}