|
|
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Manual|DEQ|2002|1.1|Section|1.1|short}} | | {{eqdmanual|Transactions}} |
| Enjoy the uncalled-for [[cognitive dissonance]] in that the {{eqderiv}} definitions define {{eqderivprov|Transaction}} — in a rather airy way — even though “{{isdaprov|Transaction}}” is already defined in the {{isdama}}, in an equally airy way.
| |
| {{underlier}}
| |
| {{sa}}
| |
| *{{isdaprov|Transaction}} ({{isdama}})
| |