82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Manual|DEQ|2002|1.1|Section|1.1|short}} | |||
Enjoy the uncalled-for [[cognitive dissonance]] in that the {{eqderiv}} definitions define {{eqderivprov|Transaction}} — in a rather airy way — even though “{{isdaprov|Transaction}}” is already defined in the {{isdama}}, in an equally airy way. | Enjoy the uncalled-for [[cognitive dissonance]] in that the {{eqderiv}} definitions define {{eqderivprov|Transaction}} — in a rather airy way — even though “{{isdaprov|Transaction}}” is already defined in the {{isdama}}, in an equally airy way. | ||
{{underlier}} | {{underlier}} | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*{{isdaprov|Transaction}} ({{isdama}}) | *{{isdaprov|Transaction}} ({{isdama}}) |