|
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{isdaanat|Transaction}} | | {{isdaanat|Transaction}} |
| What exactly counts as a Transaction under an {{isdama}} is a matter of some moment, because it will determine what you need to take into account when applying close-out netting, and (unless you’ve specified a narrower range of {{csaprov|Covered Transaction}}s) the values you need to calculate when making {{tag|collateral}} calls under your {{CSA}}.
| | . |
| | |
| Unusually, for a document so outrageously verbose in most other respects, the {{isdama}} has little to say on the subject, the {{1992isda}} leaving it entirely to the {{isdaprov|preamble}}:
| |
| | |
| :''... one or more transactions (each a “{{isdaprov|Transaction}}”) that are or will be governed by this {{isdaprov|Master Agreement}}.''
| |
| | |
| And the {{2002ma}} not going much further.
| |
| | |
| :...''“{{isdaprov|Transaction}}” has the meaning specified in the {{isdaprov|preamble}}.''
| |
| | |
| The {{eqdefs}} also define “{{eqderivprov|Transaction}}”, to no apparent point.
| |
|
| |
|
| ===[[Netting]]=== | | ===[[Netting]]=== |