Treatment of shortfalls - CASS Provision: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
===And this could happen how, exactly?===
===And this could happen how, exactly?===
Given typical [[omnibus]] structure where:
Given typical [[omnibus]] structure where:
*a counterparty to a hedge fund fails to settle an open trade into that HF's {{tag|prime broker}}; while simultaneously  
*a counterparty to a [[hedge fund]] fails to settle an open trade into that hedge fund’s {{tag|prime broker}}; while simultaneously ...
*the {{tag|prime broker}} delivers a quantity of the same security to the market on behalf of a different hedge fund customer, relying to do so on that first purchase trade settling as intended ..
*the {{tag|prime broker}} delivers a quantity of the same security to the market on behalf of a different customer, relying to do so on that first purchase trade settling as intended ...
*there may be a temporary [[shortfall]] in the prime broker’s omnibus client custody account, pending resolution of the [[fail]].  
*there may be a temporary [[shortfall]] in the [[prime broker]]’s [[omnibus]] client {{t|custody account}}, pending resolution of the [[fail]].  


Usually the [[fail]] will be quickly remedied, but if it isn’t the [[PB]] must take action to reduce its customers’ credit exposure as a result of the shortfall. It does this by putting its own assets (or money) aside, on trust for the affected clients.
Usually the [[fail]] will be quickly remedied, but if it isn’t the [[prime broker]] must reduce its customers’ [[credit exposure]] as a result of the shortfall. It does this by putting its own assets (or money) aside, on trust, for the affected clients.


{{nuts|CASS|6.6.54}}
{{nuts|CASS|6.6.54}}