Twitter Rules: Difference between revisions

Twitter Rules (view source)

Revision as of 15:54, 7 November 2022

368 bytes added , 7 November 2022

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

82,891

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{a|design|}}Loving [[Twitter]] as the [[JC]] does — one of his many standing mottoes is ''[[get off Twitter]]'' — and given the great world-wide focus on Twitter and the studied outrage of those whose blue-check marks over the weekend became degraded  since the theur reposting by “chief twit” today, the JC thought he would take the opportunity to have a look at the Twitter Rules.
+{{a|design|}}Loving [[Twitter]] as the [[JC]] does — one of his many standing mottoes is ''[[get off Twitter]]'' — and given the great world-wide focus on Twitter and the studied outrage of those whose blue-check marks over the weekend became degraded,  ad since their reposting by “chief twit” today, the JC thought he would take the opportunity to have a look at the [https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/twitter-rules Twitter Rules].
-As terms of service go, on all honesty, they’re not bad. The idea should be for them to be as plain, simple, clear and unambiguous as possible, with as little room for argument, so that anyone — even a bedroom hacker, even a russian sex-bot — knows instinctively where they stand and what they must do.
+As terms of service go, in all honesty, they’re really not bad. The idea should be for them to be as plain, simple, clear and unambiguous as possible, with as little room for argument, so that anyone — even a bedroom hacker, even the fifteen Russian sex-bots who follow the JC — knows instinctively where they stand and what they must do.
-And, as a platform designed for all the world, and not just we sainted few of the [[Libtard|liberal metropolitan elite]], the rules should really follow common sense. They should be intuitive enough that ''you don’t need to read them'', and if you do, what is in them should surprise only those
+And, as a platform designed for all the world, and not just we sainted few of the [[Libtard|liberal metropolitan elite]], the rules should really follow common sense. They should be intuitive enough that ''you don’t need to read them'', and if you do, what is in them should surprise only those whose grasp of the basic tenets of civil society is shaky.
+And they are not bad. Mostly no legalese — though you can see a few places where the legal eagle in charge of the TOBs just help herself — and they make broad sense.
+But they could be neater still. So the JC took the opportunity to give them a once-over.
-gives us an opportunity to give them a once-over.
 Here you go, Mr Musk: you are welcome.
 {| class="wikitable"