Twitter Rules: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|design|}}Loving Twitter as the JC does, given the great world-wide focus on Twitter, and their reposting by “chief twit” today, gives us an opportunity to give them a once-over.
{{a|design|}}Loving [[Twitter]] as the [[JC]] does — one of his many standing mottoes is ''[[get off Twitter]]'' — and given the great world-wide focus on Twitter and the studied outrage of those whose blue-check marks over the weekend became degraded  since the theur reposting by “chief twit” today, the JC thought he would take the opportunity to have a look at the Twitter Rules.
 
As terms of service go, on all honesty, they’re not bad. The idea should be for them to be as plain, simple, clear and unambiguous as possible, with as little room for argument, so that anyone — even a bedroom hacker, even a russian sex-bot — knows instinctively where they stand and what they must do.
 
And, as a platform designed for all the world, and not just we sainted few of the [[Libtard|liberal metropolitan elite]], the rules should really follow common sense. They should be intuitive enough that ''you don’t need to read them'', and if you do, what is in them should surprise only those
 
gives us an opportunity to give them a once-over.
Here you go, Mr Musk: you are welcome.
Here you go, Mr Musk: you are welcome.
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"