US attorney: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|people|}}Readers may detect some animus — a peculiar aversion — on the [[Jolly Contrarian]]’s part to [[US attorney|attorneys of a North American disposition]], but really he is quite fond of them, one on one. Individually, [[US attorney]]s are uncommonly good, decent people, and as long as you don’t get them onto the subject of {{tag|US Securities Regulation}} or market practice, perfectly agreeable company, especially as the evening draws on. Only when taken as a collective does the prospect pall.
{{a|people|}}Readers may detect some animus — a peculiar aversion — on the [[Jolly Contrarian]]’s part to [[US attorney|attorneys of a North American disposition]], but really he is quite fond of them, one on one. Individually, [[US attorney]]s are uncommonly good, decent people, and as long as you don’t get them onto the subject of {{tag|US Securities Regulation}} or market practice, perfectly agreeable company, especially as the evening draws on. Only when taken as a collective does the prospect pall.


For they — and the institutions that have shaped them and which they comprise — have come up with some of the most confounded gouts of articulated of nonsense ever to don a pair of stilts.  
For they — and the institutions that have shaped them and which they comprise — have come up with some of the most confounded gouts of articulated of [[Nonsense on stilts|nonsense ever to don a pair of stilts]].  


Things like:
Things like:
Line 8: Line 8:
*[[Gross negligence]]
*[[Gross negligence]]
*[[Equitable indemnity]]
*[[Equitable indemnity]]
*Civil actions by regulators for criminal actions


===Cultural imperialism===
===Cultural imperialism===