Universal affirmative: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Universal affirmative (view source)

Revision as of 21:34, 22 October 2020

91 bytes added , 22 October 2020

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

81,898

edits

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 As Monty Python had it, given the premise, “all fish live underwater” and “all mackerel are fish", one cannot conclude that “if you buy kippers it will not rain", or that “trout live in trees", much less that “I do not love you any more.”
-===Do not confuse with a statistical observation===
+===Do not confuse a universal affirmative with an ''[[average]]''===
-The [[universal affirmative]] “all Xs are Ys”  is a different thing from the statistical observation “the ''average'' of all Xs is Y”, and the two should not be, but by those under the thrall of [[identity politics]] commonly are, confused. Not only are they not the same, one does not imply the other either.
+The [[universal affirmative]] “all Xs are Ys”  is a different thing from the statistical observation that “the ''average'' of all Xs is Y”, and the two should not be, but by those under the thrall of [[identity politics]] commonly are, confused. Not only are they not the same, one does not imply the other either.
-Take the statistical observation “the average hep-cat likes the Rolling Stones”. This is clearly ''not'' good grounds for concluding that “''all'' hep-cats like the Rolling Stones”, much less the ''specific'' assertion that “''this'' hep-cat ''in particular'' likes the Rolling Stones.”
+Take the statistical observation “the [[average]] hep-cat likes the Rolling Stones”. This is clearly ''not'' good grounds for concluding that “''all'' hep-cats like the Rolling Stones”, much less the ''specific'' assertion that “''this'' hep-cat ''in particular'' likes the Rolling Stones.”
+At this point we direct you to the [[parable of the squirrels]]
 {{sa}}