82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''{{risk|Unknown unknown}}''': the [[black swan]]s. This is where the risk is most acute, precisely because your risk taxonomy, with 20:20 hindsight, is ''guaranteed'' to miss these altogether. | *'''{{risk|Unknown unknown}}''': the [[black swan]]s. This is where the risk is most acute, precisely because your risk taxonomy, with 20:20 hindsight, is ''guaranteed'' to miss these altogether. | ||
===The [[JC]]’s [[Unknown known|unknown known]]=== | ===The [[JC]]’s [[Unknown known|unknown known]]=== | ||
{{santayana}} | |||
Not included in [[Rumsfeld’s taxonomy]] (perhaps because it doesn’t make much sense at first) is the '''{{risk|unknown known}}'''. Now, before you write this off, well — see the[[Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999]] for the sorts of things a well-ordered market can forget over sixty-odd years. The [[JC]] — who likes a pet theory, as readers will know — feels that [[unknown known]]s might be the riskiest bucket of the lot. | Not included in [[Rumsfeld’s taxonomy]] (perhaps because it doesn’t make much sense at first) is the '''{{risk|unknown known}}'''. Now, before you write this off, well — see the[[Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999]] for the sorts of things a well-ordered market can forget over sixty-odd years. The [[JC]] — who likes a pet theory, as readers will know — feels that [[unknown known]]s might be the riskiest bucket of the lot. |