82,903
edits
Walsh v Jones Lang Lasalle: Difference between revisions
m
Amwelladmin moved page Walsh v Jones Lang Lasalle - Case Note to Walsh v Jones Lang Lasalle
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) m (Amwelladmin moved page Walsh v Jones Lang Lasalle - Case Note to Walsh v Jones Lang Lasalle) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{cite|Walsh|Jones Lang Lasalle|2017|IESC|38}} ([http://www.supremecourt.ie/Judgments.nsf/60f9f366f10958d1802572ba003d3f45/63cac0c4ee8705f380258132004d7b6f?OpenDocument&Highlight=0,Jones,Lang,Lasalle judgment]) an update and affirmation of the great [[negligent misstatement]] case of {{casenote|Hedley Byrne|Heller}} given by the Supreme Court of Ireland (so of persuasive force but not [[Doctrine of precedent|binding precedent]]) | {{cn}}{{cite|Walsh|Jones Lang Lasalle|2017|IESC|38}} ([http://www.supremecourt.ie/Judgments.nsf/60f9f366f10958d1802572ba003d3f45/63cac0c4ee8705f380258132004d7b6f?OpenDocument&Highlight=0,Jones,Lang,Lasalle judgment]) an update and affirmation of the great [[negligent misstatement]] case of {{casenote|Hedley Byrne|Heller}} given by the Supreme Court of Ireland (so of persuasive force but not [[Doctrine of precedent|binding precedent]]) | ||
JLL sent Walsh a brochure for a property which overstated its floorspace by 20%. The brochure carried a disclaimer stating (in small print): | JLL sent Walsh a brochure for a property which overstated its floorspace by 20%. The brochure carried a disclaimer stating (in small print): | ||
:''“Whilst every care has been taken in the preparation of these particulars, and they are believed to be correct, they are not warranted and intending purchasers/lessees should satisfy themselves as to the correctness of the information given.”'' | |||
Walsh, a purchaser, sued, claiming: | Walsh, a purchaser, sued, claiming: | ||
| Line 28: | Line 27: | ||
A disclaimer of a duty of care can be evidence that no duty of care is assumed | A disclaimer of a duty of care can be evidence that no duty of care is assumed | ||
{{sa}} | |||
{{ | |||
*([http://www.supremecourt.ie/Judgments.nsf/60f9f366f10958d1802572ba003d3f45/63cac0c4ee8705f380258132004d7b6f?OpenDocument&Highlight=0,Jones,Lang,Lasalle judgment]) | *([http://www.supremecourt.ie/Judgments.nsf/60f9f366f10958d1802572ba003d3f45/63cac0c4ee8705f380258132004d7b6f?OpenDocument&Highlight=0,Jones,Lang,Lasalle judgment]) | ||
*{{casenote|Hedley Byrne|Heller}} | *{{casenote|Hedley Byrne|Heller}} | ||
*[[Negligent misstatement]] | *[[Negligent misstatement]] | ||