82,021
edits
West Midland Baptist (Trust) Assn v Birmingham: Difference between revisions
West Midland Baptist (Trust) Assn v Birmingham (view source)
Revision as of 08:25, 24 September 2021
, 24 September 2021no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
No, as it turned out. | No, as it turned out. | ||
{{Capsule West Midland Baptist Trust}} | {{Capsule West Midland Baptist Trust}} | ||
=== | ===[[Goedel]]’s [[undecidability]] applied to the [[common law]]=== | ||
This question — should a “newly decided” [[Golden thread|thread]] of [[common law]] apply to human affairs pre-dating its development which were specifically constructed in contemplation of common law principles which, the new authority has adjudged to be wrong? — articulates the same paradox by which [[Kurt Gödel]] buggered up David Hilbert’s aspiration to describe a complete and consistent set of all mathematic axioms.<ref>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert%27s_program David Hilbert’s program] </ref> | This question — should a “newly decided” [[Golden thread|thread]] of [[common law]] apply to human affairs pre-dating its development which were specifically constructed in contemplation of common law principles which, the new authority has adjudged to be wrong? — articulates the same paradox by which [[Kurt Gödel]] buggered up David Hilbert’s aspiration to describe a complete and consistent set of all mathematic axioms.<ref>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert%27s_program David Hilbert’s program] </ref> | ||