Without limiting the generality of the foregoing: Difference between revisions

Without limiting the generality of the foregoing (view source)

57 bytes added , 8 April 2019

no edit summary

83,229

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 A tedious articulation of a pointless contrivance: the “[[without limitation]]” clause.
-See, you don’t need to say “[[without limiting the generality of the foregoing]]”, because you can just say “[[without limitation]]”, and you don't need to say “[[without limitation]]” because it carries no semantic content. Unless you have described a limitation, one will not be implied, either as a matter of basic linguistic construction or, for that matter, [[common law]]. If you ''have'' described a limitation, then what the hell are you doing writing “[[without limitation]]”?
+See, you don’t need to say “[[without limiting the generality of the foregoing]]...”, because you can just say “[[without limitation]]”, and you don’t need to say “[[without limitation]]...” ''because it carries no semantic content whatsoever''. Unless you have described a limitation one will not be [[Implied term|implied]], either as a matter of basic linguistic construction or, for that matter, [[common law]]. If you ''have'' described a limitation, then what the hell are you doing writing “[[without limitation]]”?
 Why are the [[Mediocre lawyer|best-paid professional writers in the world]] such ham-hocked users of their own language?
 {{seealso}}
+*[[Implied term]]
 *[[without limitation]]
 *[[I never said it was]]
 {{plainenglish}}