Little old ladies: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*[[Greenclose]] | *[[Greenclose]] | ||
*[[Guarantee]] | *[[Guarantee]] | ||
*{{casenote|Bibby Financial Services Ltd|Magson}} | |||
*{{casenote|Lisle-Mainwaring|Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea}} | |||
{{c|egg}} | {{c|egg}} | ||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:54, 1 March 2019
Beware of little old ladies — and Welsh hoteliers — when contemplating litigation. As Ovid put it, “anus matronae parvae malas leges faciunt”[1].
- Greenclose
- Guarantee
- Bibby Financial Services Ltd v Magson
- Lisle-Mainwaring v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
References
- ↑ He didn’t.