Bibby Financial Services Ltd v Magson

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The Jolly Contrarian Law Reports
Our own, snippy, in-house court reporting service.
JCLR.png
A shelf in the JC’s law library yesterday
Editorial Board of the JCLR: Managing Editor: Lord Justice Cocklecarrot M.R. · General Editor: Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, K.C. · Principle witness: Mrs. Pinterman

Common law | Litigation | Contract | Tort |

Click ᐅ to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

A magnificent example of the old common law maxim Anus matronae parvae malas leges faciunt — “little old ladies make bad law”.

In Bibby Financial Services Ltd v Magson [2011] EWHC 2495, Bibby offered an invoice discounting facility to a company and, as security for amounts due to Bibby, two directors of the company gave personal guarantees and warranties in respect of sums due.

The company defaulted. Bibby sought to enforce the personal guarantees.

The directors argued that neither the personal guarantees were binding because they were executed as deeds and, while all signatures had been witnessed and the documents had been handed over, the documents had still not been delivered.

The directors’ personal guarantees, even though signed and witnessed, were not in a final form: Manuscript amendments had been made with the intention that clean versions of the documents would be prepared incorporating the amendments, which would then be circulated and signed again.

At trial the directors’ argument won and Bibby could not enforce the documents as they had not been delivered as deeds.

Blimey!

See also