(i) Statement. As soon as practicable following an Early Termination Date, each party will calculate its Section 6(e) amount and give the other party a statement:
(1) showing reasonable detail of its calculations;
(i) Statement. On or as soon as reasonably practicable following the occurrence of an Early Termination Date, each party will make the calculations on its part, if any, contemplated by Section 6(e) and will provide to the other party a statement
(1) showing, in reasonable detail, such calculations (including any quotations, market data or information from internal sources used in making such calculations),
(3) giving details of the relevant account to which any amount payable to it is to be paid.
In the absence of written confirmation from the source of a quotation or market data obtained in determining a Close-out Amount, the records of the party obtaining such quotation or market data will be conclusive evidence of the existence and accuracy of such quotation or market data.
(1) on the day on which notice of the amount payable is effective in the case of an Early Termination Date which is designated or occurs as a result of an Event of Default and
(2) on the day which is two Local Business Days after the day on which notice of the amount payable is effective (or, if there are two Affected Parties, after the day on which the statement provided pursuant to clause (i) above by the second party to provide such a statement is effective) in the case of an Early Termination Date which is designated as a result of a Termination Event.
A popular parlour game amongst those pedants who insist on using the 1992 ISDA is to laboriously upgrade every inconsistent provision to the 2002 ISDA standard. You might well ask why, but then you might well ask why anybody watches films from the Fast and Furious franchise. Because they can. Or, possibly, to preserve the slightly more generous grace periods for Failure to Pay[1]and Bankruptcy<Thirty days in the 1992 ISDA versus 15 in the 2002 ISDA.</ref> (in which case, downgrade the new version, wouldn't you? But no).
[[special:diff/{{{1}}}/{{{2}}}|comparison]]