Certification - NDA Provision

Revision as of 11:24, 3 March 2020 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs)

What this clause does — well, search me. If you certify falsely that you have destroyed the information when you haven’t, then what? Is that any more egregious breach of the contract than not having destroyed it as directed in the first place? Is the measure of damage different? No. Are you any more able to prove any breach or loss? No.

NDA Anatomy™
JC’s guide to non-standard confidentiality agreements.
For the OneNDA, see the OneNDA Anatomy

The OneNDA clause
Template:OneNDA Certification view template

Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

But there is a fun organisational time bomb buried in this provision. Your negotiator has a free option now to create paranoid mayhem among senior people, who should know better, at some unstated point in the future, when she is well clear of the blast zone. This should gladden her heart. The requirement for some warm body in your organisation, at some unstated future date, to certify that secret squirrel information, which as far as anyone knows was sent by email and propagated through inboxes, sent items, email canoes and cloud servers in 74 different jurisdictions and could be anywhere, has been effectively destroyed or put beyond practical use will send normally sober people scuttling for exits, leaping into laundry baskets, planking, and painting the soles of their feet yellow and hiding upside down in custard.

“I can’t certify that!” the general counsel will wail. “How am I supposed to know what it’s been full destroyed? The sky will fall in on my head if I certify this and it hasn’t!”

For a cynic, this is an edifying sight. It tends to confirm one’s careful, lengthily cultivated prejudices.