Financial Collateral Directive

A word about credit risk mitigation

Legal security: Mortgage • Pledge • Lien • Bailment Equitable security: Charge • fixed • floating \| ABWOS \| Equitable lien Credit risk mitigation: Title transfer \| Guarantee \| Letter of credit \| Netting Friends and relations: Rehypothecation \| Equivalent Documents: 1994 NY CSA \| 1995 CSA \| 1995 ISDA CSD (English law) Regulation: LPA 1925 \| Financial Collateral Regulations \| LPMPA 1994 Index: Click ᐅ to expand: Taking security Security Collateral

Tell me more Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

The Financial Collateral Directive (2002/47/EC (EUR Lex)) is a well-intended piece of EU Regulation that, by common consent, didn't quite achieve what it set out to, which was to introduce

“a Community framework to reduce credit exposure in financial collateral arrangements. These common rules contribute to the effectiveness and integration of European financial markets, reducing credit losses and thereby stimulating cross-border transactions and competitiveness.”

Overview

The directive was designed to simplify and universalise the process of taking security in financial contracts across the EU – for one thing it would mean that any formal registration or perfection requirements which otherwise would be required (registering the security interest with the registrar of companies for example) do not apply.

Contractual Provisions: The Financial Collateral Directive is a little more vague about what counts as a financial collateral arrangement than is ideal, so you may see contractual stipulations that both parties agree their arrangement is intended to be one.

While this is no doubt intended to help, given that, in the final analysis, the person likely to challenge that analysis would be a competing creditor, and the person who would be arbitrating on it would be a liquidqator, if an arrangement were not formally within the definition, then the fact that the parties agreed it was intended to be probably wouldn’t.

What it does

The FCD divides financial collateral arrangements into two mutually exclusive categories:

Title transfer financial collateral arrangements: Under a TTCA a collateral-provider transfers full ownership of the financial collateral to the collateral-taker on terms that It will transfer back equivalent assetswhen the obligations are discharged; and
Security financial collateral arrangements: Under an SFCA the collateral provider provides financial collateral by way of security but retains full ownership of the financial collateral remains with the collateral-provider.

Appropriation

As well as disapplying certain formalities to effective security interest, the FCD creates a remedy of “appropriation”, a novel remedy certainly as regards shares, Which was previously unknown to English law:

Where a legal or equitable mortgage is the security interest created or arising under a security financial collateral arrangement on terms that include a power for the collateral-taker to appropriate the collateral, the collateral-taker may exercise that power in accordance with the terms of the security financial collateral arrangement, without any order for foreclosure from the courts.

Title transfer collateral arrangements

Title transfer collateral arrangements: TTCAs are not security arrangements of any kind, do not therefore require registration, and therefore the Financial Collateral Directive doesn't really apply to them. But contrast differing styles of agreement that cover the same product:

a 2010 GMSLA is a TTCA, so isn't in scope for the financial collateral regualtions;
a Master Securities Lending Agreement is a security interest arrangement, and so is in scope.

Interpretation

Helpful Clifford Chance article here

Adoption

Portugal: It was adopted by Portugal in July 2004 (see in depth article here)
UK: It was adopted by the UK under the Financial Collateral Arrangement (No.2) Regulations 2003, fondly known to all as the Financial Collateral Regulations.