Would-level opinion

Revision as of 12:57, 13 April 2023 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{a|work|{{image|would|jpg|}}}}{{quote|“Would level” is the strongest degree of assurance that an attorney can provide when opining on bankruptcy matters. :—Legal isolat...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

is meant to mean one has the highest possible degree of comfort things won’t go wrong, and therefore one won’t be fired, but over time and the vicissitudes of normal market practice, worn smooth by years of gentle polishing by the vicuña twill that houses a million well-heeled posteriors means, definitively, one will not be fired if things go wrong. It is plausible deniablility. It is evidence of due diligence, res ipsa loquitur.

Office anthropology™
The JC puts on his pith-helmet, grabs his butterfly net and a rucksack full of marmalade sandwiches, and heads into the concrete jungleIndex: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

“Would level” is the strongest degree of assurance that an attorney can provide when opining on bankruptcy matters.

—Legal isolation of transferred financial assets, PWC Viewpoint