82,891
edits
Aleebee: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
PROSECUTION: Did anyone see you entering your house?<br> | PROSECUTION: Did anyone see you entering your house?<br> | ||
WITNESS: No.<br> | WITNESS: No.<br> | ||
PROSECUTION: M’Lud, there is one thing very vital lacking from Mrs Pinterman’s account so far, and that is the aleebee. The aleebee is the crucial matter in this case. The aleebee is what we’re looking for; so where is the aleebee? <br> | PROSECUTION: M’Lud, there is one thing very vital lacking from Mrs Pinterman’s account so far, and that is the ''aleebee''. The ''aleebee'' is the crucial matter in this case. The ''aleebee'' is what we’re looking for; so where is the ''aleebee''? <br> | ||
DEFENCE: ''What'' is the | DEFENCE: ''What'' is the “aleebee”?<br> | ||
JUDGE: Yes, Mr. Davis: perhaps you’d like to explain to the court the precise meaning of this word?<br> | JUDGE: Yes, Mr. Davis: perhaps you’d like to explain to the court the precise meaning of this word?<br> | ||
PROSECUTION: The aleebee, M’Lud, is defined as being a plea that when an act took place, one was elsewhere.<br> | PROSECUTION: The ''aleebee'', M’Lud, is defined as being a plea that when an act took place, one was elsewhere.<br> | ||
DEFENCE: ''Oh''! Oh, an alibi.<br> | DEFENCE: ''Oh''! Oh, an alibi.<br> | ||
JUDGE: Is that what you mean, Mr. Davis?<br> | JUDGE: Is that what you mean, Mr. Davis?<br> | ||
PROSECUTION: M’Lud, are we going to let phonetic discrepancies deter us from the facts? The facts are, no one saw Mrs Pinterman entering her house, and ultimately, she has no aleebee. <br> | PROSECUTION: M’Lud, are we going to let phonetic discrepancies deter us from the facts? The facts are, no one saw Mrs Pinterman entering her house, and ultimately, she has no ''aleebee''. <br> | ||
DEFENCE: She has no “''alibi''”.<br> | DEFENCE: She has no “''alibi''”.<br> | ||
PROSECUTION: Ah, even my learned counsel for the defence admits it. His | PROSECUTION: Ah, even my learned counsel for the defence admits it. His ''cleent'' is ''gwilty''. | ||
DEFENCE: What are you talking about? | DEFENCE: What are you talking about? | ||
PROSECUTION: Gwilt! Gwilt! Why, even her very identity is in doubt. [[Mrs. Pinterman]], have you or have you not in the past gone under an alleyarse? <br> | PROSECUTION: ''Gwilt''! ''Gwilt''! Why, even her very identity is in doubt. [[Mrs. Pinterman]], have you or have you not in the past gone under an ''alleyarse''? <br> | ||
WITNESS: What? <br> | WITNESS: What? <br> | ||
PROSECUTION: Have you used an alleyarse? M’Lud, the qu’estion is crucial. <br> | PROSECUTION: Have you used an ''alleyarse''? M’Lud, the ''qu’estion'' is crucial. <br> | ||
JUDGE: But we don’t understand the question, Mr Davis. What is an “alleyarse”? <br> | JUDGE: But we don’t understand the question, Mr Davis. What is an “alleyarse”? <br> | ||
DEFENCE: An alleyarse? An alleyarse? I can scarcely believe my ears! It’s a common enough legal term. <br> | DEFENCE: An ''alleyarse''? An ''alleyarse''? I can scarcely believe my ears! It’s a common enough legal term. <br> | ||
JUDGE: I’ve never heard of it. <br> | JUDGE: I’ve never heard of it. <br> | ||
PROSECUTION: I’ll refer you to any number of standard reference works: Goldsmith, Armitage & Berlin: ''Teach Yourself Law'', Book 4; The Open University Criminology Course, Part 1; The ''Perry Mason Book for Boys'', 1962. An alleyarse is defined as the assumption of an alternative identity for nefaraious purposes. <br> | PROSECUTION: I’ll refer you to any number of standard reference works: Goldsmith, Armitage & Berlin: ''Teach Yourself Law'', Book 4; The Open University Criminology Course, Part 1; The ''Perry Mason Book for Boys'', 1962. An ''alleyarse'' is defined as the assumption of an alternative identity for nefaraious purposes. <br> | ||
JUDGE: Nefar''ai''ous purposes?<br> | JUDGE: Nefar''ai''ous purposes?<br> | ||
PROSECUTION: Precisely, M’Lud. We have heard it all egged —<br> | PROSECUTION: Precisely, M’Lud. We have heard it ''all egged'' —<br> | ||
DEFENCE: ''Alleged''.<br> | DEFENCE: ''Alleged''.<br> | ||
PROSECUTION: ... that this woman visited her spose — <br> | PROSECUTION: ... that this woman visited her ''spose'' — <br> | ||
DEFENCE: ''Spouse''. <br> | DEFENCE: ''Spouse''. <br> | ||
PROSECUTION: ... on that fattle night —<br> | PROSECUTION: ... on that ''fattle'' night —<br> | ||
JUDGE: ''Fatal'' night. <br> | JUDGE: ''Fatal'' night. <br> | ||
PROSECUTION: ... but I submit she’s little more than a common pewblic nweesonce — | PROSECUTION: ... but I submit she’s little more than a common ''pewblic nweesonce'' — <br> | ||
WITNESS AND JUDGE: ''Nuisance''! <br> | WITNESS AND JUDGE: ''Nuisance''! <br> | ||
PROSECUTION: And her whole testimonny is little more than a tiss-way of lies.<br> | PROSECUTION: And her whole ''testimonny'' is little more than a ''tiss-way'' of lies.<br> | ||
JUDGE: A ''tissue'', a ''tissue''!<br> | JUDGE: A ''tissue'', a ''tissue''!<br> | ||
PROSECUTION: Bless you, M’Lud <br> | PROSECUTION: Bless you, M’Lud <br> | ||
PROSECUTION: As the Bard put it: “Hell hath no furry like a woman scrawned.”<br> | PROSECUTION: As the Bard put it: “Hell hath no ''furry'' like a woman ''scrawned''.”<br> | ||
WITNESS: I Just … I don't understand!<br> | WITNESS: I Just … I don't understand!<br> | ||
JUDGE: Quiet! This case has been one of the most difficult and embarrassing of my long career. You are an evil and malicious young trollop who has wilfully committed an evil crime, and yet you have come to this court and, without any consideration, forced this unfortunate young man to behave like a cross between a human vegetable and Ronnie Barker. You are someone who wantonly thrusts herself upon men for sexual fantasy wherever you may find them. Perhaps you'd like to join me for lunch.}} | JUDGE: Quiet! This case has been one of the most difficult and embarrassing of my long career. You are an evil and malicious young trollop who has wilfully committed an evil crime, and yet you have come to this court and, without any consideration, forced this unfortunate young man to behave like a cross between a human vegetable and Ronnie Barker. You are someone who wantonly thrusts herself upon men for sexual fantasy wherever you may find them. Perhaps you'd like to join me for lunch.}} | ||