Chatbot: Difference between revisions

20 bytes added ,  12 March 2020
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|tech|}}It’s just so obvious when you think about it. Lawyers are ornery, craggy, expensive and equivocal, and if they do give you a straight anwer it will be so hamstrung by [[double negative]]s, [[passive]]s and arcane constructions that most likely you won’t understand what they say anyway.
{{a|tech|}}{{JC on technology}}It’s just so obvious when you think about it. Lawyers are ornery, craggy, expensive and equivocal, and if they do give you a straight anwer it will be so hamstrung by [[double negative]]s, [[passive]]s and arcane constructions that most likely you won’t understand what they say anyway.


Why not just use a [[chatbot]]? It works okay for triaging customer complaints about Virgin internet doesn’t it?
Why not just use a [[chatbot]]? It works okay for triaging customer complaints about Virgin internet doesn’t it?