Chatbot: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
194 bytes added ,  7 August 2020
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|tech|}}{{JC on technology}}It’s just so obvious when you think about it. Lawyers are ornery, craggy, expensive and equivocal, and if they do give you a straight anwer it will be so hamstrung by [[double negative]]s, [[passive]]s and arcane constructions that most likely you won’t understand what they say anyway.
{{a|tech|[[File:Gort.jpg|450px|center|What’s a cute little neural network like you doing in a place like this anyway?]]}}
:{{JC on technology}}


Why not just use a [[chatbot]]? It works okay for triaging customer complaints about Virgin internet doesn’t it?
It’s just so obvious when you think about it.
 
Lawyers are ornery, craggy, expensive and equivocal, and if they do give you a straight anwer it will be so hamstrung by [[double negative]]s, [[passive]]s and arcane constructions that most likely you won’t understand what they say anyway.
 
Why not just use a [[chatbot]]? It works okay for triaging customer complaints about Virgin Media’s godforsaken internet service doesn’t it?
{{Sa}}
*[[Why is reg tech so disappointing?]]

Navigation menu