Copyright: Difference between revisions

1,487 bytes removed ,  15 May 2019
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
''see also: [[Information]]''<br>
''see also: [[Information]]''<br>
===On the distinction between copyright and [[confidence]]===
{{copyright and confidence}}
The key thing is to distinguish between [[breach of copyright]] and [[breach of confidence]].
====Breach of copyright====
Copyright subsists in the particular articulation of the information, rather than in the information per se. To breach of copyright is to deny a copyright owner the commercial benefit of its creation: e.g., by accessing for free something the copyright owner wants you to pay for. In other words:
*I ''can’t'' copy ''Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone'' without J.K. Rowling’s permission;
*But I ''can'' tell you the plot.
====Breach of confidence====
Breach of confidence is less about the ''form'' of the information and more about the ''content'': If I have signed a [[confidentiality agreement]] I can copy confidential information to my heart’s content, as long as I only use it within the bounds of the licence I have been granted. In other words as long as I don’t disclose the ''substantive content'' of that information to anyone else. Here the forbidden action is “telling you the plot”: I could do that either by:
*Giving you a full copy of the material
*Telling you the plot without copying anything at all.
Breach of confidence is where the real compliance issues lie because it implies –
*The Information that is non-public: therefore there are significant market abuse, insider dealing issues;
*It is the substantive content and not the particular form of the information that is valuable.
===Examples===
===Examples===
====Investor presentation materials====
====Investor presentation materials====