|The Jolly Contrarian’s Dictionary |
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™
On the distinction between copyright and confidence
The key thing is to distinguish between breach of copyright and breach of confidence. The former is an intellectual property right over the form of information; the latter a contractual right over the substance of information.
- Breach of copyright: Copyright subsists in the particular articulation of the information, rather than in the information per se. To breach someone’s copyright is to deny a copyright owner the commercial benefit of its creation: e.g., by accessing for free something the copyright owner wants you to pay for. In other words I can’t copy Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone without J.K. Rowling’s permission, but I can tell you the plot.
- Breach of confidence: Breach of confidence is less about the form of the information and more about its substance: If I have signed a confidentiality agreement I can copy confidential information to my heart’s content, as long as I only use it within the bounds of my licence to use it. In other words, I can do what I like as long as I don’t disclose the content of that information to anyone else. Here the forbidden action is “telling you the plot”: I could do that either by giving you a full copy of the material, or telling you the plot without copying anything at all. Breach of confidence thus creates heightened compliance issues, implying as it does that the confidential information is not public, presenting risks of market abuse and insider dealing.
- It is the substantive content and not the particular form of the information that is valuable.
Big difference here.
- Copyright — account for profits: If I breach your copyright must account to you for the profits I have made out of the misuse of your information.
- Confidence — damages: If I beach your confidence, I must compensate you for the damages you have suffered as a result. My profit from the use of the information is not part of the calculation (unless, by profiting from it, I have deprived you of the opportunity to profit, and even then you have to persuade a court that such a consequential loss was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of my breach, which courts have traditionally been reluctant to do.
Investor presentation materials
- a low risk of copyright infringement (even if you do “breach copyright”, who is going to sue you and what would their loss be?)
- a fairly low risk of breach of confidence (I guess you might violate securities laws by distributing materials in certain places)
- a fairly low risk from a market abuse perspective (by its nature investor materials are designed as a pitch to outsiders – and in those IBD scenarios where it might not be, you would be confi’d up to kingdom come anyway.
FT and Bloomberg articles
Commercially published articles (also index outputs and so on) present:
- a real risk of copyright infringement: here the very business motivation for creating them is that people who read them will be prepared to pay for them
- a low risk of breach of confidence: By definition this information is in the public domain – anyone who wants to pay for it can have it.