Design principles: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|design|}}
{{a|design|}}
In Don Norman’s terms design is comprised of [[affordance]]s, [[signifier]]s, [[mapping]] and [[feedback]], a taxonomy of which the design of legal products seems utterly ignorant.
In {{Author|Don Norman}}’s terms<ref>{{Br|The Design of Everyday Things}}</ref> design is comprised of [[affordance]]s, [[signifier]]s, [[mapping]] and [[feedback]], a taxonomy of which the design of legal products seems utterly ignorant.
*[[Know your purpose]]
*[[Know your purpose]]
*[[Assume there will be accidents]]: The role of the risk manager is to know where the risks are concentrated, not to be satisfied there are no risks. If your [[RAG status]] has been uniformly green at every [[opco]] for the last ten years you should [[get your coat]]. Because either there ''is no'' [[risk]], so what are you even doing chairing an [[opco]], or you are flat-out delusional, so someone ''else'' is needed.   
*[[Assume there will be accidents]]: The role of the risk manager is to know where the risks are concentrated, not to be satisfied there are no risks. If your [[RAG status]] has been uniformly green at every [[opco]] for the last ten years you should [[get your coat]]. Because either there ''is no'' [[risk]], so what are you even doing chairing an [[opco]], or you are flat-out delusional, so someone ''else'' is needed.   
Line 18: Line 18:
*{{br|The Design of Everyday Things}}
*{{br|The Design of Everyday Things}}
*[[Blind spot assistance]]
*[[Blind spot assistance]]
{{Ref}}