Equitable indemnity: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Not a thing.
Not a thing.


''Except in California''<ref>[http://vondranlegal.com/what-is-definition-of-equitable-idemnity/ Client briefing on the fabulous Californian legal concept of the [[equitable indemnity]]]</ref>.
''Except in California''<ref>[http://vondranlegal.com/what-is-definition-of-equitable-idemnity/ Client briefing on the fabulous Californian legal concept of the [[equitable indemnity]]]</ref>. Which reminds me:
 
Which reminds me:
:''Q: How many Californians does it take to screw in a lightbulb?''
:''Q: How many Californians does it take to screw in a lightbulb?''
:''A: None. Californians screw in spa-pools.''
:''A: None. Californians screw in spa-pools.''
{{hawf}}
{{hawf}}


Since it isn’t a thing, its non-existence can be definitively established by deft use of a suitable [[disclaimer]].
Anyway, since it isn’t a thing, its non-existence can be definitively established by deft use of a suitable [[disclaimer]].
{{ref}}
{{ref}}