Expenses - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{isdasnap|11}}
{{fullanat2|isda|11|2002|11|1992}}
==Commentary==
Observers will note that, but for the odd comma, these two provisions are identical. And revolutionarily brief.  
Observers will note that, but for the odd comma, these two provisions are identical. And revolutionarily brief. Not that they ''couldn’t'' be improved, of course; they just weren’t.
 
Not that they ''couldn’t'' be improved, of course; they just weren’t.


The {{isdaprov|Expenses}} referred to in this provision would not be captured by the definition of "'''{{isdaprov|Close Out Amount}}'''" or "'''{{isdaprov|Early Termination Amount}}'''" because, [[qed]], they arise only once that amount has been determined and the non-defaulting party is in the process of collecting it.
The {{isdaprov|Expenses}} referred to in this provision would not be captured by the definition of "'''{{isdaprov|Close Out Amount}}'''" or "'''{{isdaprov|Early Termination Amount}}'''" because, [[qed]], they arise only once that amount has been determined and the non-defaulting party is in the process of collecting it.
{{anat|isda}}