Expenses - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{fullanat2|isda|11|2002|11|1992}}
{{isdaanat|11}}
Observers will note that, but for the odd comma, these two provisions are identical. And revolutionarily brief.  
Observers will note that, but for the odd comma, the {{1992ma}} and the {{2002ma}} are identical. And deliciously brief.  


Not that they ''couldn’t'' be improved, of course; they just weren’t.
Not that they ''couldn’t'' be improved, of course; they just weren’t.


The {{isdaprov|Expenses}} referred to in this provision would not be captured by the definition of "'''{{isdaprov|Close Out Amount}}'''" or "'''{{isdaprov|Early Termination Amount}}'''" because, [[qed]], they arise only once that amount has been determined and the non-defaulting party is in the process of collecting it.
The {{isdaprov|Expenses}} referred to in this provision would not be captured by the definition of "'''{{isdaprov|Close Out Amount}}'''" or "'''{{isdaprov|Early Termination Amount}}'''" because, [[qed]], they arise only once that amount has been determined and the non-defaulting party is in the process of collecting it.

Navigation menu