|
|
(16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{eqderivsnap|12.9(a)(ix)}} | | {{eqdmanual|12.9(a)(ix)}} |
| ====Commentary====
| |
| Relevant in the context of {{eqderivprov|Additional Disruption Events}} and hedging disruption as the entity which is actually carrying out the hedging activity, if it isn't the party itself (where not specified, it defaults to the parties themselves.
| |
| | |
| Now, even if hedging against the street is carried out out of another group entity, there would be an inter-company risk transfer so arguable a bit otiose). Note also that "{{eqderivprov|Non-Hedging Party}}" definition somewhat assumes that the {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}} will indeed be the actual counterparty to the {{isdaprov|Transaction}}.
| |
| | |
| ====See also====
| |
| See, for example, definitions:
| |
| *{{eqderivprov|Non-Hedging Party}},
| |
| *{{eqderivprov|Hedging Disruption}},
| |
| *{{eqderivprov|Increased Cost of Hedging}},
| |
| *{{eqderivprov|Loss of Stock Borrow}},
| |
| *{{eqderivprov|Increased Cost of Stock Borrow}},
| |
| *{{eqderivprov|Hedging Shares}},
| |
| *{{eqderivprov|Lending Party}}.
| |
| | |
| | |
| {{eqderivanatomy}}
| |