82,891
edits
IT department: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
One of the great paradoxes of any large organisation, and a great example of an inverse correlation. For the larger the IT department is, the worse the firm’s information technology architecture is sure to be. There is, indeed, an [[Scale paradox - Risk Article|upper bound]] on the potential size of any financial services firm: the point where it is ''too big to function''. | {{a|work|}}One of the great paradoxes of any large organisation, and a great example of an inverse correlation. For the larger the IT department is, the worse the firm’s information technology architecture is sure to be. There is, indeed, an [[Scale paradox - Risk Article|upper bound]] on the potential size of any financial services firm: the point where it is ''too big to function''. | ||
It is a curious fact of corporate experience that the more salutary a firm’s internal technological support — the more it relies on [[FAQ]]s, [[chatbot]]s, and [[outsourcing|outsourced]] helpdesks staffed by [[school-leavers from Bucharest]] reading off [[playbook]]s perched on their laps — the more people are actually employed in baffling concatenations of middle management in the IT department. | |||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Scale paradox - Risk Article]] | *[[Scale paradox - Risk Article]] | ||