Lateral quitter: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
: — oddly disingenuous slogans of HR: an occasional series}}
: — oddly disingenuous slogans of HR: an occasional series}}
{{d|{{PAGENAME}}|ˈlætərəl ˈkwɪtə|n|}}One who voluntarily leaves your organisation to work somewhere else. A greatly ''unexamined'' constituency.  
{{d|{{PAGENAME}}|ˈlætərəl ˈkwɪtə|n|}}One who voluntarily leaves your organisation to work somewhere else. A greatly ''unexamined'' constituency.  
=== Lateral quitters are ''good'' staff, [[Q.E.D.|QED]] ===
General ''[[a priori]]'' proposition: Lateral quitters are ''good'' employees: ones you ''don’t'' want to leave, who added value. At least, they will be if HR is doing a passable job — [[Spartan if]] — because if so, ''poor staff won’t be leaving of their own free will''.
Commercial firms are not charities for the intellectually vulnerable.<ref>Though, some forget this. A large financial services institution recently displayed in its internal branding: “We are proud of our [[diversity]] policy. We hire regardless of physical or mental ability.”</ref> They should actively exit employees who are not performing to expectation.
Maxim: {{maxim|Professional employment should not be a hostage situation. Either way.}}
===The wilful blindness of management===
===The wilful blindness of management===
Management will steadfastly deny any lateral quitter is missed. The trend towards “[[exit interview]] by [[chatbot]]” — if they bother with one at all — suggests corporations systematically undervalue the people they are losing.   
Management will steadfastly deny any lateral quitter is missed. The trend towards “[[exit interview]] by [[chatbot]]” — if they bother with one at all — suggests corporations systematically undervalue the people they are losing.   
Line 36: Line 43:
But free, for the first and last time, of those chilling effects of free speech, ''they might just tell you in an [[exit interview]]''.   
But free, for the first and last time, of those chilling effects of free speech, ''they might just tell you in an [[exit interview]]''.   


Why not at least ask?
Why not at least ''ask''?
 
=== Lateral quitters are ''good'' staff, [[Q.E.D.|QED]] ===
General ''[[a priori]]'' proposition: Lateral quitters are ''good'' employees: ones you ''don’t'' want to leave, who added value.
 
They will be if HR capability is working passably — [[Spartan if]] — because if so, you will have already dispatched the laggards.
 
Commercial firms are not charities for the intellectually vulnerable.<ref>Though, some forget this. A large financial services institution recently displayed in its internal branding: “We are proud of our [[diversity]] policy. We hire regardless of physical or mental ability.”</ref> They should actively exit employees who are not performing to expectation.
 
Maxim: {{maxim|Professional employment should not be a hostage situation. Either way.}}


===The [[competence phase transition]]===  
===The [[competence phase transition]]===