82,891
edits
Regulatory perimeter: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
''So has'' this communication really been made in Australia, even though it looks like it? Does it make a difference ''where'' the digital wizardry is inserted? Does pretending to use the word “bank” in Australia, to people outside Australia, comprise a transgression of the regulatory perimeter? | ''So has'' this communication really been made in Australia, even though it looks like it? Does it make a difference ''where'' the digital wizardry is inserted? Does pretending to use the word “bank” in Australia, to people outside Australia, comprise a transgression of the regulatory perimeter? | ||
Unlike a fourth-day pitch in Adelaide, nothing really turns on it, but it is an interesting conundrum to consider. | Unlike a fourth-day pitch in Adelaide, nothing really turns on it, but it is an interesting conundrum to consider. Perhaps one of those regulatory perimeter experts with a high boredom threshold might know? | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||