Return Amount (VM) - VM CSA Provision

Revision as of 12:29, 24 May 2021 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs)

2016 ISDA Credit Support Annex (VM) (English law)
A Jolly Contrarian owner’s manual™

Resources and navigation

Paragraph 2(b) in a Nutshell

Use at your own risk, campers!
2(b) Return Amount. If the Transferor demands a Return Amount at least equalling the Transferee’s Minimum Transfer Amount on a Valuation Date, the Transferee must transfer the specified Equivalent Credit Support (VM) with a Value of the Return Amount (VM) (rounded under Paragraph 11(c)(vi)(B)) to the Transferee and the Credit Support Balance (VM) will be proportionately reduced. The “Return Amount (VM)” is the amount by which the Value of the Transferor’s Credit Support Balance (VM) (adjusted for pending but unsettled transfers) exceeds the Transferee’s Exposure.

Full text of Paragraph 2(b)

2(b) Return Amount (VM). Subject to Paragraphs 3 and 4, upon a demand made by the Transferor on or promptly following a Valuation Date, if the Return Amount (VM) for that Valuation Date equals or exceeds the Transferee’s Minimum Transfer Amount, then the Transferee will transfer to the Transferor Equivalent Credit Support (VM) specified by the Transferor in that demand having a Value as of the date of transfer as close as practicable to the applicable Return Amount (VM) (rounded pursuant to Paragraph 11(c)(vi)(B)) and the Credit Support Balance (VM) will, upon such transfer, be reduced accordingly. Unless otherwise specified in Paragraph 11(c)(i)(B), the “Return Amount (VM)” applicable to the Transferee for any Valuation Date will equal the amount by which:
(i) the Value as of that Valuation Date of the Transferor’s Credit Support Balance (VM) (adjusted to include any prior Delivery Amount (VM) and to exclude any prior Return Amount (VM), the transfer of which, in either case, has not yet been completed and for which the relevant Regular Settlement Day falls on or after such Valuation Date)
exceeds
(ii) the Transferee’s Exposure.


Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Content and comparisons

The only differences here are the liberal, but all the same redundant, spraying of “(VM)” all over the shop in the 2016, a single reference to the Regular Settlement Day in place of non-Regular — that is to say, regularSettlement Day (which goes pretty much without saying anyway, per our nutshell version) and the fact that the balance is deducted from the Credit Support Balance in the 1995, but the Transferee’s Exposure in the 2016 (there not being a concept of a Credit Support Amount in the 2016), for reasons which are explored more fully below).

Summary

General discussion

Template:M gen 2016 CSA 2(b)

See also

Exposure under the CSA

References