Greenclose v National Westminster Bank plc: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
''[[parvos vetus dominarum legis malus faciunt]]''
''[[anus matronae parvae malas leges faciunt]]''


A case opining on the meaning of the apparently harmless {{isdaprov|Notices}} Section (Section {{isdaprov|12}}) of the {{1992ma}}, and in particular what is "an [[electronic messaging system]]" and more to the point what it is ''not'' - which, in the opinion of learned Justice Andrews, includes [[email]].
A case opining on the meaning of the apparently harmless {{isdaprov|Notices}} Section (Section {{isdaprov|12}}) of the {{1992ma}}, and in particular what is "an [[electronic messaging system]]" and more to the point what it is ''not'' - which, in the opinion of learned Justice Andrews, includes [[email]].