And/or: Difference between revisions

109 bytes added ,  17 August 2016
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
*{{or}}
*{{or}}


And/or is not just ugly; it's defeatist, because of the presence of the [[virgule]], that whoreson slash, which is not even a part of idiomatic punctuation in the English language. It's a decoration. It has no fixed grammatical meaning. That slash admits that the plain, punctuated words of the English language have defeated you.
And/or is not just ugly; it’s defeatist, because of the presence of the [[virgule]], that whoreson slash, which is not even a part of idiomatic punctuation in the English language. It’s a decoration. It has no fixed grammatical meaning. That slash admits that the plain, punctuated words of the English language have defeated you.


In fact, that slash means - and can only mean - “[[or]]”. So by saying "and or" you are really saying "and, or or". But to be hermetically sealed and consistent, shouldn't you go the whole hog, and say "and, and/or or"?
In fact, that slash means - and can only mean - “[[or]]”. So by saying “[[and/or]]” you are really saying “and, ''or'' or”. But to be hermetically sealed and consistent, shouldn’t you make one further clarifying step, and say "[[and]], [[and/or]] [[or]]"?


AND DO YOU NOW SEE THE INFINITE REGRESSION YOU HAVE SET IN MOTION?
AND DO YOU NOW SEE THE INFINITE REGRESSION YOU HAVE SET IN MOTION?


Never speak of this again.
Go back to your draft and strike all examples, and we shall never speak of this again.
 
{{c2|egg|ISIA}}
{{c2|egg|ISIA}}