82,952
edits
Hedging Disruption - Equity Derivatives Provision: Difference between revisions
Hedging Disruption - Equity Derivatives Provision (view source)
Revision as of 08:31, 19 October 2016
, 19 October 2016no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{eqderivsnap|12.9(a)(v)}} | {{eqderivsnap|12.9(a)(v)}} | ||
===Commentary=== | ===Commentary=== | ||
====Pernickety amendments==== | |||
Expect to see some amendments to this clause, chiefly to appease [[Mediocre lawyer|fastidious counsel]]. For example: | |||
* You may see some tinkering with “transaction(s) or asset(s) it deems necessary to hedge the equity price risk of entering into and performing its obligations with respect to the relevant Transaction” — perhaps to refer to “[[Hedge Positions]]” instead of “transaction(s) or asset(s)”<ref>It is always sad to see an {{tag|ISDA}} drafting committee pass up the opportunity to use [[and/or]], by the way.</ref>, and to broaden equity price risk to “market risk ([[including but not limited to]] equity price risk, [[foreign exchange]] risk and [[interest rate]] risk)” | |||
*The {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}} may only be allowed to terminate any {{eqderivprov|transaction}} ''[[pro rata]]'' with the actual {{eqderivprov|Hedging Disruption}} | |||
{{triplecocktail}} | |||
===See also=== | |||
*[[Hedging disruption]] | *[[Hedging disruption]] | ||
===Consequences of Hedging Disruption=== | ===Consequences of Hedging Disruption=== | ||
Consequences of an {{eqderivprov|Additional Disruption Event}} in particular {{eqderivprov|12.9(b)(iii)}} and, where {{eqderivprov|Loss of Stock Borrow}} intersects with {{eqderivprov|Hedging Disruption}}, {{eqderivprov|12.9(b)(vii)}}: | Consequences of an {{eqderivprov|Additional Disruption Event}} in particular {{eqderivprov|12.9(b)(iii)}} and, where {{eqderivprov|Loss of Stock Borrow}} intersects with {{eqderivprov|Hedging Disruption}}, {{eqderivprov|12.9(b)(vii)}}: | ||