Disputed Calculations or Valuations - CSA Provision: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The actual wording is in that box on the left hand side, but you may find it easier to read the nutshell summary, since the new 2016 version ISDA not only passed up the opportunity to make this never-used-in-practice language simpler, but it actually made it more complicated by providing alternatives for {{2002ma}} and {{1992ma}} close-out methodologies. Which is just spectacular.
The actual wording is in that box on the left hand side, but you may find it easier to read the nutshell summary, since the new 2016 version ISDA not only passed up the opportunity to make this never-used-in-practice language simpler, but it actually made it more complicated by providing alternatives for {{2002isda}} and {{1992isda}} close-out methodologies. Which is just spectacular.
{{Nuts|4(a)|1995 CSA}}<br>
{{Nuts|4(a)|1995 CSA}}<br>
{{csaprov|Disputed Calculations or Valuations}} is a topic that could unfurl like the flower of a deadly insect-eating nightshade if you let it. DON’T LET IT.
{{csaprov|Disputed Calculations or Valuations}} is a topic that could unfurl like the flower of a deadly insect-eating nightshade if you let it. DON’T LET IT.