Notices - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

Notices - ISDA Provision (view source)

6 bytes removed , 13 March 2017

no edit summary

82,882

edits

Revision as of 12:42, 13 March 2017 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 12:43, 13 March 2017 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{fullanat2\|isda\|12~~(a)~~\|2002\|12~~(a)~~\|1992}}		{{fullanat2\|isda\|12\|2002\|12\|1992}}
	Who would have thought a notices provision would be so controversial? Especially the question "what is an [[electronic messaging system]]"? No-one, it is humbly submitted, until Andrews, J. of the Chancery decision was invited to opine on {{casenote\|Greenclose\|National Westminster Bank plc}}, the kind of "little old lady" case that makes bad law. The learned judge does nothing to dispel the assumption that lawyers are technological luddites who would apply Tip-Ex to their VDUs if they didn't have someone to do their typing for them (and if they knew what a VDU was).		Who would have thought a notices provision would be so controversial? Especially the question "what is an [[electronic messaging system]]"? No-one, it is humbly submitted, until Andrews, J. of the Chancery decision was invited to opine on {{casenote\|Greenclose\|National Westminster Bank plc}}, the kind of "little old lady" case that makes bad law. The learned judge does nothing to dispel the assumption that lawyers are technological luddites who would apply Tip-Ex to their VDUs if they didn't have someone to do their typing for them (and if they knew what a VDU was).