82,891
edits
Awards: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Yet still there seem to be some insecurities that only a gong for “Environmental Finance Personality of the Year” (it may beggar belief, but there really is such a thing); “Business Development Professional of the Year” (there are hundreds of these) or “In-house Litigation Department of the year” (what does it say about an organization that lionises its own in-house litigation team?) can redress. | Yet still there seem to be some insecurities that only a gong for “Environmental Finance Personality of the Year” (it may beggar belief, but there really is such a thing); “Business Development Professional of the Year” (there are hundreds of these) or “In-house Litigation Department of the year” (what does it say about an organization that lionises its own in-house litigation team?) can redress. | ||
O! To have existential doubts that can be so easily quashed! If an award, “judged” anonymously, without reference to published criteria, from amongst nominees whose main merit appears to be employment by a prolific advertiser of the sponsor’s product — if a personal tribute as feeble as ''that'' can assuage your deep insecurities | O! To have existential doubts that can be so easily quashed! If an award, “judged” anonymously, without reference to published criteria, from amongst nominees whose main merit appears to be employment by a prolific advertiser of the sponsor’s product — if a personal tribute as feeble as ''that'' can assuage your deep insecurities — if that is all it takes to put you back on your keel — your psychological health is rude indeed. | ||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} | ||