Deduction or Withholding for Tax - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{fullanat2|isda|2(d)|2002|2(d)|1992}}
{{fullanat2|isda|2(d)|2002|2(d)|1992}}
You can revel in the full heft of these provisions at right.


You can revel in the full heft of these provisions in below. Observant and obedient scholars will notice that the {{1992ma}} and the {{2002ma}} versions are, more or less, identical. Observant and less obedient scholars will remark what a pig’s ear the ISDA drafting committee made of a relatively simple concept and, given a once-in-a-decade opportunity to improve it in 2002, the combined intellectual might of ISDA, its members, friends and relations, and their divers [[mediocre lawyer|counsel]], retinue and entourage, couldn’t. Or didn’t.
Observant and obedient scholars will notice that the {{1992ma}} and the {{2002ma}} versions are, [[more or less]], identical. Observant and ''less'' obedient scholars will remark what a pig’s ear the ISDA drafting committee made of a relatively simple concept and, when given a once-in-a-decade opportunity to improve it in 2002, the combined intellectual might of {{tag|ISDA}}, its members, friends, relations and their divers [[mediocre lawyer|counsel]], retinue and entourage, couldn’t.  
 
Or didn’t.
 
This is, therefore, [[Q.E.D]], the apex of all possible derivatives drafting. Especially the triple negative in {{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}.
 
Make you feel great to be alive, doesn’t it. I bet you wish it could be simplified. Here: let [[me]] have a go.


This is, therefore, the apex of all possible derivatives drafting. Especially the triple negative in {{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}. Make you feel great to be alive, doesn’t it. I bet you wish it could be simplified. Here: let *me* have a go.
{{nuts|ISDA|Gross-Up}}
{{nuts|ISDA|Gross-Up}}


{{Withholding under ISDA}}
{{Withholding under ISDA}}