82,976
edits
It is not in my nature: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
'''''Lecter''': First principles, Clarice. Simplicity. Read Marcus Aurelius. Of each particular thing ask: what is it in itself? What is its nature? What does he do, this man you seek? <br> | '''''Lecter''': First principles, Clarice. Simplicity. Read Marcus Aurelius. Of each particular thing ask: what is it in itself? What is its nature? What does he do, this man you seek? <br> | ||
'''''Clarice Starling''': He kills women... '' <br> | '''''Clarice Starling''': He kills women... '' <br> | ||
'''''Lecter'': No! That is incidental. What is the first and principal thing he does? What needs does he serve by killing?'' <br> | '''''Lecter''': No! That is incidental. What is the first and principal thing he does? What needs does he serve by killing?'' <br> | ||
'''''Starling''': Anger ... social acceptance .... and ... sexual frustrations, sir... | '''''Starling''': Anger ... social acceptance .... and ... sexual frustrations, sir... | ||
'''''Lecter''': No! He '''covets'''. That is his nature. And how do we begin to covet, Clarice? Do we seek out things to covet? | '''''Lecter''': No! He '''covets'''. That is his nature. And how do we begin to covet, Clarice? Do we seek out things to covet? | ||