Tax Event - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{fullanat2|isda|5(b)(iii)|2002|5(b)(ii)|1992}}
{{ISDAnumberingdiscrepancy}}
{{ISDAnumberingdiscrepancy}}
{{isdasnap|Tax Event}}
Note, unhelpfully, the subpara reference in the {{1992ma}} is (1) and (2) and in the {{2002ma}} is (A) and (B). Note, also unhelpfully, that this paragraph is a bastard to understand. Let’s have a look then:
{{isdasnap2|5(b)(ii)|5(b)(iii)}}
===Commentary===
Note, unhelpfully, the subpara reference in the {{1992ma}} is (1) and (2) and in the {{2002ma}} is (A) and (B). Note, also unhelpfully, that this paragraph is a bastard to understand. Let's have a look then:
{{nuts|ISDA|Tax Event}}
{{nuts|ISDA|Tax Event}}


Not such a bastard after all, then. In the context of CCP, you typically add a third limb, which is along the lines of
Not such a bastard after all, then. In the context of {{tag|CCP}}, you typically add a third limb, which is along the lines of
{{box|
:''(3) required to make a deduction from a payment under an {{swapclearprov|Associated LCH Transaction}} where no corresponding Gross Up amount is required under the corresponding {{isdaprov|Transaction}} Payment under this {{isdaprov|Agreement}}.}}''
:(3) required to make a deduction from a payment under an {{swapclearprov|Associated LCH Transaction}} where no corresponding Gross Up amount is required under the corresponding {{isdaprov|Transaction}} Payment under this {{isdaprov|Agreement}}.}}
{{isdaanatomy}}