Events of Default - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
{{eventsofdefault}}
{{eventsofdefault}}
===={{isdaprov|Termination Events}} and {{isdaprov|Events of Default}}====
===={{isdaprov|Termination Events}} and {{isdaprov|Events of Default}}====
{{isdaprov|Termination Events}} and {{isdaprov|Events of Default}} under an {{isdama}} are similar in that when they occur to one party (the {{isdaprov|Affected Party}} or {{isdaprov|Defaulting Party}}) the other may terminate outstanding trades under the agreement. Differences:
{{Differences between events of default and termination events}}
*'''Events of Default''': As the word "default" implies EODs are treated as the ''fault'' the defaulting party and may give rise to third-party default rights (where the relevant {{isdaprov|Cross Default}} extends to derivatives and trading documents);
{{ref}}
*'''Termination Events''': There is less "moral turpitude" associated with a Termination Event under an {{isdama}}, and they will generally not trigger Cross Defaults (not amounting to "defaults".
 
 
 
{{isdaanatomy}}
*[[Soft Events of Default]]