Discourse on Intercourse: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "{{a|confcall|}}Discourse on Intercourse is a well-intended basically wrong-headed philosophical tract formulated by delusional Austrian librettist Otto Büchstein in 1...")
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|confcall|}}[[Discourse on Intercourse]] is a well-intended basically wrong-headed philosophical tract formulated by delusional Austrian librettist [[Otto Büchstein]] in 1769. Outraged by [[René Descartes]] suggestion that the only indubitable thing in the universe was one's own existence as a [[res cogitans|thinking thing]], [[Büchstein]] attempted to deduce an entire multipersonal [[epistemology]] from the commercial inevitability of [[business meetings]]. His logic was this: meetings must exist, since no-one in her right mind world make the idea upbif she didn't need to. So, since [[business meeting]]s are a necessary fact of life, and it is an '' [[a priori]]'' fact that a meeting must contain more than one person, there must be multiple individuals. At least three, thought [[Büchstein]] the meetor and the metee, and since transparently neither of these would willingly meet without some kind of compulsion, a third person (usually a [[management consultant]] or [[project manager]]) to force the meeting to happen and assign actions and timelines at its conclusion.
{{a|confcall|}}[[Discourse on Intercourse]] is a well-intended though basically wrong-headed philosophical tract formulated by delusional Austrian librettist [[Otto Büchstein]] in the depths of dengue fever delirium in 1769.  
 
Outraged by [[René Descartes]] suggestion that the only indubitable thing in the universe was one's own existence as a [[res cogitans|thinking thing]], [[Büchstein]] attempted to deduce an entire multi-personal [[epistemology]] from the commercial inevitability of [[business meetings]].  
 
His logic was this: meetings must exist, since no-one in her right mind world make the idea up if she didn't need to. So, since someone ''has'' made them up, [[business meeting]]s must a necessary fact of corporate life. On that predicate, it follows that as it is an ''[[a priori]]'' fact that a meeting must comprise more than one person, there must be multiple individuals in the universe, to give effect to inevitable meetings. At least three, thought [[Büchstein]]: the meetor and the meetee, and since transparently neither of these would willingly meet without some kind of compulsion, a third person (usually a [[management consultant]] or [[project manager]]) to force the meeting to happen and assign actions and timelines at its conclusion.