Flawed asset: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{anat|security}}You’ll be most likely wanting to see the discussion on this wonderfully baffling subject under Section {{isdaprov|2(a)(iii)}} of the {{isdama}}. But see also the [[extended liens]] case, which discusses “rare cases in which security rights fall wholly outside the recognised categories of [[lien]], [[pledge]], [[mortgage]] or [[charge]], and into a residual, purely [[contractual interest|contractual]], category sometimes categorised as turning the grantor’s property into a form of ‘[[flawed asset]]’.”
{{anat|security|}}You’ll be most likely wanting to see the discussion on this wonderfully baffling subject under Section {{isdaprov|2(a)(iii)}} of the {{isdama}}. But see also the [[extended liens]] case, which discusses “rare cases in which security rights fall wholly outside the recognised categories of [[lien]], [[pledge]], [[mortgage]] or [[charge]], and into a residual, purely [[contractual interest|contractual]], category sometimes categorised as turning the grantor’s property into a form of ‘[[flawed asset]]’.”


More generally, following an [[event of default]], a [[flawed asset]] provision allows an innocent, but [[out-of-the-money]] party to a {{tag|derivative}} or {{tag|securities finance}} transaction to suspend performance of its obligations without terminating the transaction and thereby crystallising a [[mark-to-market]] loss.  
More generally, following an [[event of default]], a [[flawed asset]] provision allows an innocent, but [[out-of-the-money]] party to a {{tag|derivative}} or {{tag|securities finance}} transaction to suspend performance of its obligations without terminating the transaction and thereby crystallising a [[mark-to-market]] loss.  
Line 12: Line 12:
*'''{{gmra}}''': Now here’s the funny thing. Even though the {{tag|GMRA}} is comparable to the {{tag|GMSLA}} in most meaningful ways, it '''does''' have a flawed asset provision. I don’t understand it, but that is true about much of the world of international finance.
*'''{{gmra}}''': Now here’s the funny thing. Even though the {{tag|GMRA}} is comparable to the {{tag|GMSLA}} in most meaningful ways, it '''does''' have a flawed asset provision. I don’t understand it, but that is true about much of the world of international finance.
{{2(a)(iii)}}
{{2(a)(iii)}}


__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__