83,240
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
So the real ask ought to be “to {{confiprov|put beyond practical use}}” and have an exception for regulatory retention. | So the real ask ought to be “to {{confiprov|put beyond practical use}}” and have an exception for regulatory retention. | ||
There’s also a conceptual issue with [[Derived information - Confi Provision|information the receiving party has derived]] from the {{confiprov|confidential information}}: | |||
{{derived information}} | {{derived information}} | ||
In any case {{confiprov|derived information}} should not have to be offered up to the {{confiprov|discloser}}. Query whether it should have to even be destroyed or {{confiprov|put beyond practical use}}. I mean | In any case {{confiprov|derived information}} should not have to be offered up to the {{confiprov|discloser}}. Query whether it should have to even be destroyed or {{confiprov|put beyond practical use}}. I mean, can you imagine a world without a McCartney middle eight, just because Lennon had the hump? |