82,891
edits
Passive: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:“''Our results show that a proportion of people with low educational attainment make errors with understanding the passive, and it appears that this and other important areas of core grammar ''may not be fully mastered'' by some speakers, even by adulthood. These findings could have a number of implications. If a significant proportion of the population does not understand passive sentences, then notices and other forms of written information '''may have to be rewritten''' and literacy strategies changed.”<ref>Or, to translate for people with “low educational attainment”, “Our results show that some uneducated people don't understand the passive and struggle with basic grammar, even as adults. This may mean we have to rethink how we communicate with a mass audience.''”</ref> | :“''Our results show that a proportion of people with low educational attainment make errors with understanding the passive, and it appears that this and other important areas of core grammar ''may not be fully mastered'' by some speakers, even by adulthood. These findings could have a number of implications. If a significant proportion of the population does not understand passive sentences, then notices and other forms of written information '''may have to be rewritten''' and literacy strategies changed.”<ref>Or, to translate for people with “low educational attainment”, “Our results show that some uneducated people don't understand the passive and struggle with basic grammar, even as adults. This may mean we have to rethink how we communicate with a mass audience.''”</ref> | ||
The [[passive]] is a voice beloved of [[mediocre lawyer|lawyers]] and scientists — but not, despite her best efforts to the contrary, Dr. Dabrowska — which saps even the most energetic sentence of its ''joie de vivre''; along the way obscuring [[R.A.C.I.|responsibility]] for action, depersonalising and sterilising whatever meat there may have been on the bones of your sentence. | |||
To be sure, at times where one ''should'' use the passive (if you can’t identify the [[antagonist]], or if doing so might give offence), but generally a passive sentence is longer, flatter and duller than its [[active]] equivalent. | To be sure, at times where one ''should'' use the passive (if you can’t identify the [[antagonist]], or if doing so might give offence), but generally a passive sentence is longer, flatter and duller than its [[active]] equivalent. | ||