Offices; Multibranch Parties - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{isdaanat|10}}
{{isdaanat|10}}
Paragraph 10 of the {{isdama}} allows parties to specify whether they are multibranch parties or not.
Paragraph 10 of the {{isdama}} allows parties to specify whether they are [[Multibranch Parties - ISDA Provision|Multibranch Parties]] or not.


Electing “multibranch party” status allows a [[counterparty]] to transact swap confirms out of various different [[branch]]es of the same [[legal entity]]. Details fans will immediately note that, from the point of view of legal and corporate philosophy — surely a subject dear to every attorney’s heart — the differing [[branch]]es of a [[legal entity]] have no distinct [[legal personality]] any more than does a person’s arm or leg have different personality from {{sex|her}} head. So being a “multibranch” party seems immaterial.
Electing “[[Multibranch Parties - ISDA Provision|Multibranch Party]]” status allows a [[counterparty]] to transact out of various different [[branch]]es of the same [[legal entity]]. Details fans will immediately note that, from the point of view of legal and corporate philosophy — surely a subject dear to every attorney’s heart — the differing [[branch]]es of a [[legal entity]] have no distinct [[legal personality]] any more than does a person’s arm or leg have different personality from {{sex|her}} head. So being a “multibranch” party seems immaterial.


===={{tag|Tax}}ation====
===={{tag|Tax}}ation====
Line 14: Line 14:


:“Of course there are other ways to get around it:  disclosure of the branch in a Confirmation (operational risk, and of no use in electronically booked txns), or more detailed [[reps]] in Part 5 - but none is as simple or uncomplicated as simply putting “New York” in the Multibranch election”
:“Of course there are other ways to get around it:  disclosure of the branch in a Confirmation (operational risk, and of no use in electronically booked txns), or more detailed [[reps]] in Part 5 - but none is as simple or uncomplicated as simply putting “New York” in the Multibranch election”
===[[Onboarding]]===
If you have a [[Multibranch ISDA]] do you need to [[Onboarding|onboard]] the client in each of the jurisdictions in which a listed [[branch]] is located?


===={{tag|Netting}}====
===={{tag|Netting}}====